Definition: Let them all be confounded and turned back that hate Zion.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down Psalm 129:5 – “Let them all be confounded and turned back that hate Zion.” It's a really powerful and important verse. Here's a simple explanation: What it means in plain language: This verse is saying that people who harbor hatred or opposition towards Jerusalem (the city of David and the Jewish people) will become incredibly confused and ultimately, decide to abandon their efforts to oppose it. Let’s unpack it further: “Let them all be confounded…” : This isn't just a simple statement of fact. It suggests that this hatred is causing confusion – like a puzzle being difficult to solve. It implies a deep, unsettling feeling of uncertainty and disorientation. “…and turned back…” : This means they are actively retreating or abandoning their efforts. They’re not just passively harboring their dislike; they’re deliberately choosing to stop fighting. “That hate Zion” : This is the key part. "Zion" refers to Jerusalem, which holds deep significance for Jewish people – it's considered the heart of God and a place of importance. So, “hate Zion” means they actively dislike or oppose this sacred city. What does it mean in terms of context? This verse is often interpreted as a warning about the dangers of political division and hostility. It speaks to a time when people might be driven by anger and resentment – and that resentment could lead to actions that harm others and disrupt peace. Why is it important? It’s a reminder that hatred, especially towards something sacred or significant, can have devastating consequences. It's about the potential for negativity and division to grow into harmful behavior. In short: Psalm 129:5 warns against those who actively hate Jerusalem and will ultimately abandon their efforts to oppose it. It’s a sobering reminder of the importance of peace and reconciliation. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the historical context of this passage? Talk about the meaning of “Zion” in different interpretations?